Virtual Design World Cup 第1届 学生BIM&VR设计竞赛 on Cloud
 获奖作品 审评结果
  ('11.11.04)

Virtual Design World Cup   World Cup奖(最优秀奖) 奖金100万日元!
第1届 学生BIM&VR设计竞赛 on Cloud
~ 运用BIM和VR在云服务器上进行先进的土木建筑设计竞赛! ~
Theme 2011 “ SHIBUYA Bridge ” 行人天桥设计 ~ 装点崭新的都市空间 ~



 获奖作品 评审结果

日期 2011年 11月 4日(周五)
出席者 【评审委员】
   池田 靖史(实行委员长、庆应义塾大学大学院 政策·媒体研究科教授/IKDS代表)
   花村 义久(NPO Civil城市治理站 理事长)
   Kostas Terzidis(哈弗大学准教授)
   福田 知弘(大阪大学大学院 工学研究科环境能源工学专攻 准教授)
   家入 龙太(IeiriLAB代表)
【Workshop讲师】
   伞木 宏夫(NPO地域治理工房 代表)

「Virtual Design World Cup ~第1届 学生BIM&VR设计竞赛 on Cloud~」共有58个小组参赛,最终从13个国家15个小组提出作品。2011年11月4日在FORUM8东京本社Seminar room进行评审,从15个作品中选定了World Cup奖(最优秀奖)以及5个评审员特别奖。


 最优秀奖 世界杯奖 World Cup Award

 作品标题 The Oasis

 小组名称
(所属)
金大都市研(金泽大学 都市计划 建筑计划研究室)
(金泽大学)

PDF  海报(A1)
 VR-Cloud(R)
VR-Cloud(R) 阅览顺序

阅览需要客户端软件的安装。请您点击下列链接的执行文件,进行安装。
VR-Cloud(R) Client Ver.2.0
(6,952KB)


 全体讲评

这是首届学生BIM竞赛,评审们也初次尝试使用VR-Cloud。我们衷心感谢来自世界各地的参赛小组踊跃提供作品。评审委员也同样很热情地进行了审评。评审过程中,由于海报所体现的效果和在VR数据里实际涩谷城市在人群中所感受到的印象不一致。这对选定获奖作品的过程也带来不少影响。

获奖作品都具备相当的水准,可以说所有作品都有得到最优秀奖的可能性。其中获得Challenging Award的04 Ameba作品和40 the oasis作品的2个作品一直成为讨论的中心。这是考虑到在今后建筑领域的BIM技术利用方法最期待的领域。

结果综合考虑到多方面因素包含技术性等观点,最终拥有更高实现性的40 the oasis作品获得了这次大赛的最优秀奖。但04 Ameba作品是捕捉了涉谷的人流,按照算法如同可动结构物一样的全新构想。评委们认为相比之下40 the oasis作品不仅挑战了多样的观点,还将其包容统合在内突破了以往常识的局限,把作品水平提升到一个更高的领域。

另外07 Shibuya Sky way作品利用动线跨越山手线两侧,同时也减少了交叉路口上的结构性障碍物。其想法受到好评,作品获得Civil Design奖。
地下通风带来的冷却效果反馈到形态设计的大胆理念使得富有挑战性的01 B-side作品得到Enorasis奖。将奥运会也列入意识中,重视夜间景观进行制作的20 Tokyo2020作品获得Environmental Design and Information Technology奖。在涩谷上空,以有机形态提案人们的活动场所,35 Hatching the future作品获得了Best Rendez-vous Place奖。

  评审委员会


(英译)
This is the first international competition sponsored by forum 8 related to new visualization technologies. In particular, the use the BIM and VR were of high interest in this new competition. The jury appreciated all projects as they all exhibited so many diverse and fresh ideas coming from all over the world. We appreciate your interest in this competition.

Given the diverse uses of the tools as well as the multitude of design approaches, the jury had a heated discussion in its effort to choose a winning entry. One of the points discussed in the jury process was the difference in impression of a project when viewed as a 2D versus as in VR. This had a special weight in the understanding and appreciation of the projects. So, for the future it is good to not only show the VR but also the real world situation in which the project applies to. All of the awards are of high level and we can say that they all have the possibility of getting the grand prix especially entry number 40 OASIS and entry number 04 AMOEBA. Both remained final competitors in the debate and that directed the discussion of the jury towards the potential implementation of VR in architecture.

As a result, today, number 40 OASIS got the Grand Prix award because they had a diverse point of view, used a range of tools, and developed a realistic idea. On the other hand they had some criticism concerning their architectural solution. It did not display any uniqueness or formal qualities that would justify its architectural dimension. Rather the formal solution was rather conservative and ordinary. Compared to the movable structure of the entry 04, the jury felt that while AMOEBA used less tools and exhibited structural and pedestrian problems, it did have a seminal idea as it exhibited the notion of time throughout an architectural structure. The jury felt that motion and kinetics are of paramount importance for the future of architecture and could address issues of flexibility, adjustability, and plasticity.

In addition, four more projects did catch the attention of the jury. Shibuya Sky Way received the Civil Design Award for its innovative idea of connecting two antithetical sides of Shibuya. By connecting the two sides they were able to unify Shibuya as a neighborhood as opposed to a railway station. B-Site project was awarded the Enorasis award because of its formal qualities related to the use of wind as a feedback guide. Tokyo 2020 received an Environmental Design and Information Technology award for exhibiting the city of Tokyo in its Olympic competition. Also, its use of lighting colors was of great importance as it addressed the issues of nightscape. Finally, Hatching the Future received the Challenging award for its organic form and comfort for the pedestrians.

On behalf of the Jury for the Virtual Design World Cup we would like to congratulate all entries for their wonderful, seminal, and important work.


Day2 第5届 国际VR研讨会 2011年11月16日(周三) 品川FRONT大厦

13:40-14:20 Virtual Design World Cup 第1届 学生BIM&VR设计竞赛 on Cloud颁奖式
获奖作品发表、各个评审员的讲评



 评审情况

▲海报选定 ▲FORUM8 代表取缔役社长
伊藤裕二进行开幕致词
▲评审委员长 池田靖史先生致词
▲阅览各个作品的脚本以及
VR数据进行讨论
▲最优秀奖的最终选定
委员们非常热情地交换意见
▲左起家入龙太先生、
花村义久先生、福田知弘先生、
池田靖史先生、Kostas Terzidis先生、
伞木宏夫先生

 评审员特别奖

Civil Design奖
 Civil Design Award
评审员: 花村 义久先生(NPO Civil城市治理站 理事长)

 作品标题 Shibuya Sky Way

 小组名称
(所属)
日本大学理工学部 土木工学科
结构 设计研究室
(日本大学)


PDF 海报(A1)

Best Rendez-vous Place奖
 Best Rendez-vous Place Award
评审员: 吉川 弘道先生(东京都市大学 总合研究所 地震风险管理研究室 教授)

 作品标题 Hatching the Future

 小组名称
(所属)
WEdoit
(香港理工大学/中国)


PDF 海报(A1)
Enorasis奖
 Enorasis Award
评审员: Kostas Terzidis先生(哈弗大学准教授)

 作品标题 B-side

 小组名称
(所属)
isue-y
(芝浦工业大学)


PDF 海报(A1)
Environmental Design and Information Technology奖
 Environmental Design and Information Technology Award
评审员: 福田 知弘先生(大阪大学大学院 工学研究科环境能源工学专攻 准教授)

 作品标题 Tokyo2020

 小组名称
(所属)
筑梦队
(上海大学/中国)


PDF 海报(A1)
Challenging奖
 Challenging Award
评审员: 山梨 知彦先生(日建设计 设计部门代表)

 作品标题 Ameba

 小组名称
(所属)
庆应义塾大学SFC 池田靖史研究室
(庆应义塾大学大学院)


PDF 海报(A1)

Page Top Page Top

FORUM8